Breaking Open the Black Box

The Secrets and Stories of Game Design

Pages

  • Game Design Lessons
  • Learning From My Past
  • Post-Mortems
  • Who am I?
Follow @Xelnath [mc4wp_form]

Powered by Genesis

Fit Your Audience – Don’t Put Arm Wrestling in Chess

2012.12.31 by Xelnath

I was sitting at home on vacation, when a friend told me to check Facebook to see the greatest sport every devised. I turned away from my kitchen to take a look.

Having been a competitive Go player in college, I had a significant appreciation for competitive board games. Having been a cross-country runner in high school, I had a significant appreciation for athletics.

However, I wasn’t particularly interested. Roger insisted saying: “Look! First they play, then they fight. Isn’t that AWESOME?”

Now, if you stop and think about it, it does make a lot of sense. The same kinds of skills apply to boxing and chess: reading your enemy, drawing him into a weak moment, then delivering a final takedown attack to complete the victory.

In fact, that fact that they need to continue using their brains after taking a pounding has considerable real-life connection to battlefield performance. Smart, strong warriors would be victorious where short sighted or weak ones would not.

The amount of skill required to compete in this sport is immense. A recent reports indicates that the ELO system for chess caps out at around 2800. For chess-boxing, that number is around 3300. Assuming they use the same starting point, what this says is that despite the smaller number of chess-boxing players, the skill gap between the best and worst player is much larger.

Boxing is quite popular. Chess is quite popular.  Why then isn’t Chess-Boxing also popular? Clearly there’s a ton of talent and skill involved.

Know Your Audience

As someone who never took the time to learn the strategies of Football, I often found myself hanging out with my aunts while my father, grandmother and uncles watched the Big Game. 
One day, while at a friend’s place during the Superbowl, I asked my friend Michelle why she was riveted to the screen. 
At first she joked about thinking the Quarterback had a cute butt. When I pressed the issue, she explained:

“Well, my team has been doing pretty well and I’ve been following the linebacker in my Fantasy Football league. I’m pretty sure if he gets a first down, I’ll come back to take 2nd in my league.”

… boy, then I knew why the girls blanked out when I raved about A Link to the Past.
The simple answer is that people are drawn to watch what they know and understand. If someone knows Football, they will feel comfortable watching Football. If they know Soccer, they more easily watch a game of soccer.  Something as complicated as Chess Boxing requires double the knowledge base to enjoy. 
The overlap between people who are sufficiently experienced with both chess and boxing is rather small. Perhaps that won’t always be the case, but for now it is.

Arm Wrestling is Simple

Let’s say we wanted to create a new evolution in gaming, but we wanted to make it overlap with real sports. Since we’ve decided that boxing was too complex to mix with chess, let’s trying something simple, that everyone knows – like Arm Wrestling. 
Let’s consider a possible iteration of our new game, Arm Wrestling chess:
Rules: 
  1. Plays just like regular chess
  2. When pieces fight, the opponents arm wrestle to determine if a piece is killed. 

 Awesome – that should make for a better sport, right?

Well.. no.

Don’t Cross the Streams

The reason that chess and arm wrestling are entertaining on their own is that they are contests in the same space. Two chess players battle over permutations in the mind. Similarly, two arm wrestlers contest their strength and muscle timing tactics head to head. 
The reason these games work at all, is that the conditions for success are the same on both sides of the equation.  But once we’ve mixed arm-wrestling with chess, the outcomes of any given decision have now become uncertain.  

We’ve undermined the ability of the chess player to consistently perform tactics in a way that they can reasonably and consistently expect to perform. Which detracts from the mental appeal that chess brings.  
Similarly, we’ve undermined the consistent strength performance of arm wrestling, by suddenly adding in a tactical element that means that where once upon a time, using all of your power to win was the right call, suddenly, the right call might be to lose a few arm wrestles to wear your opponent down for an important play later.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

December 2012
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Oct   Jan »

Blog Stats

  • 226,460 hits

Comments

  1. Danny Favela says

    2012.12.31 at 9:00 pm

    It’s always a delight to find games in which multiple experience types seamlessly contribute to a cohesive work. Toy Story, on the SNES, was one such title.

    Sadly, such titles are the exception.

    With the immense amount of technology and memory size available for video games today, I’m glad you’ve written out this guide so that people don’t fall into a common — and sometimes production-crippling — temptation toward an inferior product.

  2. Alexander Brazie says

    2013.01.01 at 1:01 am

    Thanks Danny. Unfortunately, I really don’t know how to get the message out.

    How do you tell people, “hey, there’s a way to do this. it works. try it and believe in it!” – I don’t know.

  3. Yoram Keness says

    2014.04.12 at 7:11 am

    I have noitced the image above (arm werstling) which may fit perfectly in a poster I am due to pesent in a professional meeting in the area of clinical microbiology and wanted to ask of your permission to use it….

  4. Alexander Brazie says

    2014.04.12 at 9:10 pm

    I got the image from http://apaladinincitadel.blogspot.com/2010/12/if-two-strength-13-fighters-arm-wrestle.html

    Ask him 🙂

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2019
  • October 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • June 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • January 2014
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • January 2012
  • September 1816